Skip to main content
Apply for a Cheap Website
Analytics · Jargon Buster

What are UTM tags?

UTM tags are campaign parameters added to a link so analytics software can describe where a visit came from. They can identify a source, medium and campaign, but do not prove that the visit caused a sale. Use consistent names, keep personal information out of URLs and check the resulting reports.

Watch a related explainer

Jersey Web video: Which link worked?
1:47 video, no narration: the steps are shown as text on screen. Read every step on the video’s own page →

In plain English

UTM tags are extra pieces of campaign information in a link. They can tell an analytics tool that a visit came from a particular newsletter, advert or other distribution route. The destination page is still the page being linked to; the added parameters describe the campaign context of the incoming visit.

Common parameters include a source, medium and campaign name. A source might identify the newsletter or platform, while the medium describes the marketing type. A campaign name helps group an organised activity. Google’s manual-tagging documentation explains how these values appear in Analytics traffic-source dimensions.

The labels are useful when they are consistent and reflect how the link was distributed. They are not independent proof that somebody read a particular message or bought because of it. The same link can be forwarded, and reporting depends on the analytics implementation and visitor conditions. Treat the data as labelled observations within those limits.

Why it matters for a Jersey business

A Jersey business might share the same service page through a newsletter, a social post and a printed QR code. Without an organised way to label incoming routes, it can be harder to compare the resulting website visits. Campaign parameters can help separate those routes in compatible reports.

The naming system should be small enough to maintain. If three staff use three versions of the same campaign name, a report may split the intended activity into several rows. Write down approved source, medium and campaign names before distributing links, and keep the final links in a simple campaign record.

A realistic Jersey example

Imagine a Jersey workshop promoting an autumn event. This is a hypothetical example. The newsletter and a partner’s event listing link to the same landing page using distinct approved source labels and one shared campaign name. Staff test both links and confirm that the destination works before publication.

Afterward, the business compares relevant reports with actual event enquiries. A labelled visit is useful context, while a completed booking is a different observation. The owner avoids treating the largest visit count as automatic evidence of the best customer outcome.

Use an agreed convention. Keep source, medium and campaign values understandable and consistent, including capitalisation. Avoid unnecessary detail that nobody will use in a report. A campaign record should explain what was distributed, where it appeared and which period the business intends to compare.

Keep personal information out of parameters. URLs can be copied, logged and shared, so a person’s name or email address is unsuitable as a casual campaign label. Use the analytics provider’s supported approach and the business’s actual privacy arrangements for the site. A useful campaign name does not need to identify an individual customer.

Check the destination and reporting. Open the final link, confirm the page and inspect the relevant traffic-source dimensions when data is available. Google’s traffic-source explanation describes how campaign information relates to reports. Advertising auto-tagging can introduce additional rules, so review the actual platform setup rather than mixing labels blindly.

Compare like periods and outcomes. Ask whether a campaign was distributed equally, whether the page changed and whether important actions were measured correctly. A small sample can fluctuate. Use the report alongside genuine enquiries or orders and describe uncertainty when the available observations are limited.

Common myths

A tagged visit proves the campaign caused a sale. Labelling and causal evidence are different things.

More tag detail always produces better analysis. Inconsistent or unused values make reporting harder.

Campaign parameters should be added to every link. Internal navigation and incoming acquisition links have different purposes.

Our take

Jersey Web’s view is to keep campaign tagging consistent and reviewable. A small naming convention, tested destination and clear outcome question can make reports more useful. The value comes from understanding the observations, rather than simply making every marketing URL longer.

Learn more

Common questions

Do UTM tags track a person’s identity?
They label campaign information in a URL. They should not contain names, email addresses or other personal identifiers. Analytics behaviour also depends on the tool’s implementation and the site’s privacy arrangements.
Should I use them on internal website links?
Use campaign tagging deliberately for incoming marketing links. Ordinary internal navigation has a different purpose and can interfere with interpreting acquisition information if it is tagged carelessly.
Do tags guarantee every visit appears in analytics?
No. Reporting depends on the analytics setup, visitor choices, browser conditions and how the link is handled. Tagged visits are not a complete record of everyone who saw a campaign.
Can I compare two differently named tags?
You can, but inconsistent naming may split one intended campaign across several rows. Keep a simple naming convention and review the resulting dimensions before drawing conclusions.

Need a hand with this?

Tell us what you’re trying to do. We’ll explain the options and what makes sense for your Jersey business.

Get practical help for your website